Federation
of Law Societies of Canada:
Guidelines on Ethics and the New Technology |
| Date:
April, 2002 |
| Questions /
Comments? Please contact Jack
Olsen |
| Copyright ©
2001-2002 The Federation of Law Societies of Canada |
Guidelines on
Ethics and the New Technology
Foreword from the Law Society of British Columbia
Ethics Committee
The Guidelines on Ethics and the New
Technology, approved by the Federation of Law Societies, are
set out below, with some minor changes to make them more
comprehensible to BC lawyers.
The concerns addressed by these Guidelines are
covered in a general way by existing rules in the Law Society Professional
Conduct Handbook. Issues relating to the transmission of
confidential information over the Internet and the security of
electronic communications were published in Ethics Committee
opinions that appeared in the Benchers' Bulletin for
June-July1998 and January-February 2001.
However, the Guidelines expand on issues
covered by the rules and these opinions and are published here for
the information of the profession. They are guidelines only and
are not part of the Professional Conduct Handbook |
Table
of Contents
Part I
Technology and the Duty of Competence
Part
2 Practising Law on the Internet
Part
3 Confidentiality and the Internet
Part
4 Software Piracy
Part
5 Advertising
Part
6 General
Appendix
1 Software Piracy
Part I
Technology and the Duty of Competence
A lawyer must maintain a state of competence on a continuing basis in
all areas which the lawyer practices. This includes maintenance and
improvement of knowledge and skills.
With the ever-increasing impact of technology on the practice of law, a
lawyer using technology must either have reasonable understanding of the
technology used in the lawyer's practice, or access to someone who has
such understanding. As well, certain endeavours in the practice of law may
require a lawyer to be technologically proficient. For example, it might
be impossible to competently handle a complex child/spousal support case
without recourse to support calculation software; similarly, it might be
impossible to competently handle a complex litigation matter involving a
large number of documents without litigation support software. Part 2 Practising Law on the
Internet
1. Upholding the law of other
jurisdictions.
A lawyer must respect and uphold the law in personal conduct and in
rendering advice and assistance to others. "The law" for these
purposes is to be broadly interpreted and includes common law, such as
tort law, in addition to criminal and quasi-criminal statutes,
A lawyer who practices law in another jurisdiction by providing legal
services through the Internet must respect and uphold the law of the other
jurisdiction, and must not engage in unauthorized practice in that
jurisdiction. 2. Privileged communications
A lawyer who comes into possession of a privileged written
communication of an opposing party through the lawyer's own impropriety,
or with knowledge that the communication is not intended to be read by the
lawyer, must not use the communication nor the information contained
therein in any respect and must immediately return the communication to
opposing counsel, or if received electronically, purge the communication
from the system. This includes communications received through e-mail. 3. Conflict of Interest
To ensure that there is no breach of the obligations to avoid conflict
of interest when delivering legal services using the Internet or e-mail, a
lawyer must determine the actual identity of parties with whom the lawyer
is dealing. 4. Capacity in which Lawyer is Acting
Where there may be confusion as to the capacity in which a lawyer is
acting, the lawyer must ensure that such capacity is made as clear as
possible to anyone with whom the lawyer deals.
A lawyer who communicates with others in chat rooms, discussion groups
or otherwise through electronic media such as the Internet must advise
others participating in the communication when the lawyer does not intend
to provide legal services. Part 3 Confidentiality and the
Internet
A lawyer has a duty to keep confidential all information concerning a
client's business, interests and affairs acquired in the course of a
professional relationship.
- A lawyer must not disclose any confidential information regardless
of its source and whether or not it is a matter of public record.
- A lawyer must not disclose the identity of a client nor the fact of
the lawyer's representation.
- A lawyer must take reasonable steps to ensure the maintenance of
confidentiality by all persons engaged or employed by the lawyer.
A lawyer using electronic means of communication must ensure that
communications with or about a client reflect the same care and concern
for matters of privilege and confidentiality normally expected of a lawyer
using any other form of communication. This would include e-mail, whether
via the Internet, internal e-mail or otherwise, or the use of cellular
telephones or fax machines to transmit confidential client information.
First, both the lawyer and the client can choose to use an electronic
means of communication, including the Internet, cellular telephones and
fax machines, as a means of communication in the solicitor-client
relationship. The use on the part of the client or the lawyer may be said
to be an implied invitation to use or respond via the same electronic
means.
Second, while initially there seems to have been much debate on this
topic, the better view today is that there is no basis to conclude that
Internet communications are any less private than those using traditional
land-line telephones. There does not seem to be a ready and apparent
danger that e-mail is less confidential than fax machines or cellular
telephones, so anyone using the Internet to communicate has a reasonable
and justified expectation of privacy, and it cannot be said as a simple
rule that a lawyer must encrypt anything that the lawyer believes the
client would not want to read in the local newspaper.
Third, lawyers communicating on the Internet without encrypting their
transmissions do not violate the principle of confidentiality. While
encryption makes theft or interception more difficult, even strong
encryption can be technically defeated. The vulnerability to theft and
interception therefore remains. However, in ordinary circumstances, a
lawyer is not expected to anticipate the criminal activity of theft of
solicitor-client communications on the Internet any more than mail theft.
The use of e-mail and other electronic media presents opportunities for
inadvertent discovery or disclosure of messages, given the manner in which
information:
- is transmitted within the network systems of an Internet;
- is kept as a permanent record if conscious efforts are not made to
delete those messages and thereby destroy the prospect of discovery or
inadvertent disclosure.
A lawyer using such technologies must develop and maintain a reasonable
awareness of the risks of interception or inadvertent disclosure of
confidential messages and how they can be minimized.
Encryption software is available and must be used, if electronic means
of communication are used, for those confidences that may be so valuable
or sensitive that it is in the client's interest to take the
extraordinary step of encrypting to protect them. The challenge, as in so
many ethical areas, is to recognize those extraordinary situations and
exercise sound judgment in relation to them.
When using electronic means to communicate in confidence with clients
or to transmit confidential messages regarding a client, a lawyer must:
- develop and maintain an awareness of how technically best to
minimize the risks of such communications being disclosed, discovered
or intercepted;
- use reasonably appropriate technical means to minimize such risks;
- when the information is of extraordinary sensitivity, advise clients
to use encryption software to communicate with their lawyer, and use
such software; and
- develop and maintain such law office management practices as offer
reasonable protection against inadvertent discovery or disclosure of
electronically transmitted confidential messages.
Part 4 Software Piracy
Software piracy is illegal and therefore unethical. Lawyers must
respect and uphold the law and refrain from discreditable conduct, both as
a lawyer and in other capacities.
Lawyers must maintain a standard of competence in their practice and
ensure that those they employ or train act in a competent fashion. They
must therefore ensure that support staff and students-at-law are aware of
applicable licensing provisions. The management and organization of and
compliance with licence agreements for all software used by a firm must
not be left entirely in the hands of an office manager or support staff.
A lawyer can guard against accidental software piracy by carefully
reviewing the provisions of the software licensing agreements for software
used in the office. Where strict compliance with the licensing agreement
may work a hardship, exemption must be sought from the licensor.
The Software Publishers Association suggests the following steps to
staying "legal":
- Appoint a software manager.
- Create and implement a software policy and code of ethics.
- Establish software policies and procedures.
- Conduct internal controls analysis.
- Conduct periodic software audits.
- Establish and maintain a software log of licences and registration
materials.
- Teach software compliance.
- Enjoy the benefits of software licensing compliance.
- Thank employees and students for participating.
Part 5
Advertising
1. Applicability of Rules of Professional
Conduct to Electronic Media
Advertising by lawyers either directly or through a medium or agent
should be interpreted to include electronic media, including web sites,
network bulletin boards, and direct e-mail, and is governed by the Rules
of Professional Conduct.
General -- Meaning of "advertisement" means any statement,
oral, written, or electronic, made by a lawyer or firm to the public in
general or to one or more individuals and having as a substantial purpose
the promotion of the lawyer or firm.
These guidelines propose restrictions on advertising content which are
directly applicable to electronic advertising and govern advertising
initiated through new technology. 2. Identification of Lawyer in Internet
Communications
Electronic media are different from more traditional methods of
communication because distribution of the advertisement is not limited
geographically, nor is access to it always restricted or focused to a
particular group of users. In these circumstances, there is an enhanced
potential that a viewer of a network bulletin or web site might view an
advertisement and be confused as to a lawyer's identity, location, or
qualifications.
A lawyer making representations in generally accessible electronic
media must include the name, law firm, mailing address, licensed
jurisdiction of practice, and e-mail address of at least one lawyer
responsible for the communication's content in the communication. 3. Multi-jurisdictional Advertising
Where a lawyer is entitled to practise in more than one jurisdiction,
and these jurisdictions are identified in representations on electronic
media, that lawyer must ensure that the advertisement complies with the
advertising rules governing legal advertising in each of those
jurisdictions. 4. Restrictions on Indiscriminate
Distribution
Some forms of direct solicitation via electronic media can produce
widespread and unwanted communication. Although the existing Directive
does not contemplate direct solicitation of potential clients, limits on
contacts with potential clients who are recovering or are vulnerable as a
result of a traumatic experience, and may be hospitalized or in custody
must be observed.
The following provisions are examples of interactions with the public
which may not be compatible with the best interests of the profession, the
administration of justice and society generally:
- Advertisement of professional services using electronic media where
the advertisement is directly and indiscriminately distributed to a
substantial number of newsgroups or electronic mail addresses.
- Posting of electronic messages to newsgroups, listservs or bulletin
boards whose topic scope does not include the proposed advertisement.
- Advertisement of professional services using electronic media where
the advertisement substantially interferes with another's use of the
media or invades the privacy of other users.
A lawyer's advertising activity is further governed by the provisions
of these guidelines which directs that a lawyer in conducting the business
aspects of the practice of law must adhere to the highest business
standards of the community. Where indiscriminate electronic distribution
of advertising information is unacceptable in the general business
community that makes use of technology, the largely unwritten business
practices governing conduct will apply to the advertising lawyer. Part 6 General
When interpreting these guidelines, the lawyer should have reference to
the applicable Code of Professional Conduct. Like the Code, these
guidelines should be understood and followed in their spirit as well as in
the letter.
The details of the fact situations in which the Code and these
guidelines apply will change as technology changes, but the principles of
ethical professional conduct will not. Appendix 1 Software Piracy
What is software piracy?
Software piracy is the unauthorized copying, reproduction, use or
manufacture of software products. Microsoft defines 'copying' as: (1)
downloading software (reproducing it) on your computer's temporary
memory by running the programs from a floppy disk, hard disk, CD ROM, or
other storage material; (2) downloading software onto another media such
as a hard disk (e.g. a diskette) or your computer's hard disk (your
computer's main information storage area); or (3) using software which
has been placed on your office's network server.
Software piracy is not contingent upon the value of the software
copied. The unauthorized copying of a $10 computer game and the
unauthorized copying of a $1,000 office management suite are both acts of
software piracy.
Piracy does not include the sale of software in accordance with the
terms of transfer characteristically contained in a license agreement. How does software piracy occur?
There are several ways in which software can be pirated. Counterfeiting
occurs whenever software is duplicated and sold by a person and in a
manner not authorized by the owner as if it were the genuine article.
Softlifting occurs whenever a single copy of the genuine article is
purchased but it is then copied onto several computers, contrary to the
terms of the license agreement. Hard-disk loading occurs when you purchase
a computer which already has software copied onto its hard disk, contrary
to the terms of the manufacturer's licensing agreement. A
"certificate of authenticity" is not a license agreement.
Bulletin-board piracy occurs when software is placed on a BBS (Bulletin
Board Service - on the Internet) and it is downloaded onto a hard disk,
contrary to the terms of the manufacturer's licensing agreement.
Software rental occurs when software is rented or borrowed (like a
videotape) for temporary use, contrary to the terms of the licensing
agreement.
Pirating can occur whenever copying occurs. A person who receives
e-mail containing contraband software is now in possession of pirated
software. Are software licensing policies
standardized?
The short answer is, NO! There are at least 4 general types of licences
(also referred to as "end user licence agreements" or "EULA's")
used in the software industry:
Node-locking - a form of licence that restricts use of software
to a particular computer only. While many may use the software, it can
only be used on that computer;
User-based licensing - a form of licence that restricts use to a
particular user only, commonly through some form of password. While anyone
with the password may use the product, only that person can access the
software at that time;
Site licensing - a form of licence that restricts use to a
particular site or geographical area, such as an office;
Network licensing - a form of licence that restricts (or the cost
of licensing is calculated on) a particular number of users of the
software. When usage exceeds a particular number of users, another licence
must be paid for. This form of licence is generally used by larger
corporations using many different forms of software.
Each of these licence forms may also make use of an expiration date,
which can further limit its use. Each agreement must be scrutinized in
order to ensure compliance with its individual terms. While there is some
controversy over the "shrinkwrap licence", it is certainly far
from clear that this form of licensing agreement is always unenforceable. Is software piracy illegal?
Yes. The Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42 protects a
developer or owner's intellectual property rights in all software
created by her/him. The owner has the exclusive right to produce,
reproduce or publish the work or any substantial part thereof. Copying
software is illegal, regardless of whether the copied software is
thereafter offered for sale, is given away free, or is retained for the
copier's own use. The copyright also exists automatically upon creation.
That is to say, it is not necessary for the creator to place the mark ©,
the words "copyright", "All rights reserved" or any
other words for the software to receive copyright protection.
Copyright infringement can result in liability for any damage caused to
the copyright owner (including lost profits). Software piracy is also an
indictable offence punishable by up to 5 years imprisonment and/or a fine
of up to $1 million. Are any of these provisions enforced?
Yes. Software publishing is a multi-billion dollar industry. Software
piracy has become a substantial industry as well. It has been estimated
that more than $8 billion worth of software is pirated annually; more than
$1 billion of which occurs in the United States alone. With such
substantial losses, concerted efforts are being made to enforce copyright
and licensing provisions relating to software. These efforts include
education of software users and the public at large, creation of an
anti-piracy hotline, software audits and civil lawsuits against offending
businesses or individuals. The Software Publishers Association (SPA)
embarked upon an anti-piracy campaign in 1990 and reports that its efforts
have resulted in more than $16 million in penalties since then.
Enforcement actions have not been limited to the United States.
Fortunately, the software industry appears to be moving towards more
flexible methods of licensing designed to accommodate a variety of highly
individual circumstances. Use measurement software is available and is a
viable alternative for the very large corporation or law firm.
Back to
Practice Resources |