2005: No. 02 July-August
Rudi Gellert
Burnaby, BC (formerly of Surrey, B.C.)
Called to the bar: May 19, 1995
Undertook not to practise law: December 16, 2003
Became a non-practising member: January 1, 2004
Citations of May 8 and October 2, 2002 (Facts and verdict)
Discipline hearing: June 18, 2003
Panel: G. Ronald Toews, QC, Chair, Gordon Turriff, QC and Michael Falkins
Report issued: September 5, 2003 (indexed as 2003 LSBC 32)
Counsel: Jessica Gossen for the Law Society and Mr. Gellert on his own behalf
Citation of June 20, 2003 (Facts and verdict)
Discipline hearing: October 14, 2003
Panel: Russell S. Tretiak, QC, as a single-Bencher panel by consent
Report issued: October 24, 2003 (indexed as 2003 LSBC 38)
Counsel: Jessica Gossen for the Law Society and Mr. Gellert on his own behalf
Citation of January 12, 2004 (Facts and verdict)
Discipline hearing: August 23, 2004
Panel: John Hunter, QC, as a single-Bencher panel, by consent
Report issued: September 15, 2004 (indexed as 2004 LSBC 28)
Counsel: James Doyle for the Law Society and Russell MacKay for Mr. Gellert
All Citations (Penalty)
Discipline hearing: March 29, 2005
Panel: John Hunter, QC, as a single-Bencher panel, by consent
Report issued: May 2, 2005 (indexed as 2005 LSBC 15)
Counsel: James Doyle for the Law Society and Russell MacKay for Mr. Gellert
In the course of his practice, Mr. Gellert:
On December 16, 2003 Mr. Gellert voluntarily undertook not to practise law and he became a non-practising member on January 1, 2004.
The hearing panels on each of the four citations found, and Mr. Gellert acknowledged, that his conduct constituted professional misconduct.
The underlying cause of Mr. Gellert’s misconduct was severe depression for which he had since received treatment. The hearing panel concluded that the penalty should reflect the seriousness of the misconduct, but should also recognize Mr. Gellert’s underlying medical problem and mitigating factors. The panel ordered that Mr. Gellert:
1. be suspended for 18 months (effective December 16, 2003, the date on which he undertook not to practise);
2. obtain a psychiatric evaluation satisfactory to the Practice Standards Committee prior to resuming practice; and
3. practise only as an employee of one or more lawyers.